Parking Idiots is Singapore's hottest blog, that showcases all those idiots who can't park properly and need to be publically shamed to learn a lesson.
A Colt driver, who should be Bolted to the ground for parking like a Dolt, and left to Molt.
Taken at Maysprings condo. Submitted on 16 September 2006.
18 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Vehicle No.: SBB688G Vehicle Type: P10 - Passenger Motor Car Vehicle Attachment 1: With Sun Roof Vehicle Scheme: Normal Vehicle Make: MITSUBISHI Vehicle Model: COLT 1.5 A Chassis No.: Z27A0009164 Engine No.: 4G15CX6883 Engine Capacity: 1468 cc Year Of Manufacture: 2003 Original Registration Date: 13 Nov 2003 Road Tax Expiry Date: 12 Nov 2006 Inspection Due Date: 12 Nov 2006
Bolted to the ground! Ha, ha, ha...! :D Colt driver would be justified if he's got an ass so fat he can't exit the car if it's parked close to the pillar-wall.
Don't you know some condo actually offer 2 lots per unit? If they really give 2 lots per unit there's nothing wrong for parking like this... since he is entitled to both right? I mean i'm just curious if both lots belong to him will you people still shame him. I feel you people just like to shame people at their expenses.
I don't see a problem here. Since 2 lots given to them why cannot park 2 lots... ITS THEIR LOTS. THEY PAID for it. You people stop being unreasonble here. Its not a public lot anyway... get what i mean? Don't mess into people personal property and affair here.
Some blog you all say they park 2 lots need to pay 2 lots, now this pic here paid 2 lots park into the 2 lots they paid for, why still criticise? Admin please remove this pic.
Hi somehow i agree if they paid for the 2 lots they can park in the 2 lots the way they want as long as its not causing and obstruction. For example you rent a hotel with queen size bed, you can sleep anywhere you want right? Its meant for 2 person but since you already paid for it you can sleep anywhere you want because you're not disturbing others. So in these case i feel is the same, since 2 lots belong to them i don't see any obstruction caused to others. Cheers.
18 comments:
Vehicle No.: SBB688G
Vehicle Type: P10 - Passenger Motor Car
Vehicle Attachment 1: With Sun Roof
Vehicle Scheme: Normal
Vehicle Make: MITSUBISHI
Vehicle Model: COLT 1.5 A
Chassis No.: Z27A0009164
Engine No.: 4G15CX6883
Engine Capacity: 1468 cc
Year Of Manufacture: 2003
Original Registration Date: 13 Nov 2003
Road Tax Expiry Date: 12 Nov 2006
Inspection Due Date: 12 Nov 2006
Bolted to the ground! Ha, ha, ha...! :D Colt driver would be justified if he's got an ass so fat he can't exit the car if it's parked close to the pillar-wall.
Is a colt really more expensive than a lancer?
Well still..
THAT DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE RIGHTS TO PARK LIKE THAT MOROON!
He deserves a Jolt to his brains.
ok what if not how he open his door? he maybe fat or bigger in size
Fat or big sized? How big is his brains? Can't he park in another lot?
If not then get out from the boot!
whats the problem with you...
I've a problem with poor parking just like many of us.
What's YOUR problem?
"Is a colt really more expensive than a lancer?"
Another form of personal attack here. Damn!
Nice car number. SBB688.. Stylo.
Is Mc Donalds really more expensive than Burger King?
NOW, we're getting personal...
Colt 1.5(A) $50,988.
Lancer 1.6(A) $48,488.
Don't you know some condo actually offer 2 lots per unit? If they really give 2 lots per unit there's nothing wrong for parking like this... since he is entitled to both right? I mean i'm just curious if both lots belong to him will you people still shame him. I feel you people just like to shame people at their expenses.
to 8.48pm
so wat condo offer 2 lots to each unit..
2lots = 2cars
simple maths rite
Why? You got problem with propark? You better dun mess with him loh.
3/10/06 10:37 PM
No No No.......They can park! You cannot!!!
alan said...
to 8.48pm
so wat condo offer 2 lots to each unit..
2lots = 2cars
simple maths rite
___________________________________
If 2 lots means the 2 lots belong to them, they can park anyway they like as long as it is not disturbing or obstructing other vehicles.
I don't see a problem here. Since 2 lots given to them why cannot park 2 lots... ITS THEIR LOTS. THEY PAID for it. You people stop being unreasonble here. Its not a public lot anyway... get what i mean? Don't mess into people personal property and affair here.
Some blog you all say they park 2 lots need to pay 2 lots, now this pic here paid 2 lots park into the 2 lots they paid for, why still criticise? Admin please remove this pic.
Hi somehow i agree if they paid for the 2 lots they can park in the 2 lots the way they want as long as its not causing and obstruction. For example you rent a hotel with queen size bed, you can sleep anywhere you want right? Its meant for 2 person but since you already paid for it you can sleep anywhere you want because you're not disturbing others. So in these case i feel is the same, since 2 lots belong to them i don't see any obstruction caused to others. Cheers.
Post a Comment